스퍼스를 상대로 한 클리퍼스의 경기 막판 부진은 로테이션 실패이다

Article hero image
By Editorial Team · March 28, 2026 · Enhanced

Clippers' Late-Game Woes Against Spurs Are a Rotational Failure

By Sarah Kim · April 3, 2026 · 8 min read

There's something brewing in San Antonio, and it's not just the Alamo. The Spurs have had the Clippers' number twice in the past month, winning 119-115 on March 16, 2026, and 117-112 on March 6, 2026. For a Clippers squad with legitimate championship aspirations, those aren't just frustrating losses — they're diagnostic red flags that reveal deep structural problems in how this team is constructed and coached for high-leverage moments.

What makes these defeats particularly damning is the pattern. The Clippers aren't losing because they're outclassed from tip-off. They're losing because they're being systematically dismantled in the final eight minutes of regulation — a window where coaching decisions, rotational discipline, and late-game IQ separate contenders from pretenders. Two losses, two collapses, one unmistakable conclusion: this is a schematic and personnel failure that demands immediate attention.

Anatomy of Two Collapses: Breaking Down the Film

March 6: The 25-Point Comeback That Should Never Have Happened

The March 6 loss in San Antonio was, by any measure, one of the most stunning collapses of the 2025-26 NBA season. The Clippers held a 25-point advantage midway through the third quarter, a lead that, statistically, teams convert to wins at a rate exceeding 97% at that stage of a game. The Spurs didn't just chip away at that lead — they erased it entirely, outscoring Los Angeles 42-19 over the game's final 18 minutes to complete a 117-112 victory.

The tactical unraveling began with a simple but catastrophic decision: the Clippers went conservative. Their defensive scheme shifted from aggressive ball pressure to a passive drop coverage, designed ostensibly to protect against Wembanyama's three-point shooting. Instead, it gave San Antonio's guards — particularly Stephon Castle and Devin Vassell — open mid-range pull-ups and driving lanes that the Clippers had successfully denied all game. In the fourth quarter alone, the Spurs shot 61.5% from the field. The Clippers, by contrast, went cold, shooting 34.8% in the final period while committing four turnovers that led directly to 11 Spurs points.

March 16: The 24-Point Lead Squandered

Ten days later, the Clippers found themselves in a hauntingly familiar scenario. Back in Los Angeles, they built a 24-point lead in the second half before the Spurs, once again, mounted a methodical comeback. The 119-115 final score doesn't capture the full horror of what transpired: the Clippers were outscored 38-17 over the game's final 12 minutes, a stretch that exposed every rotational weakness that had been papered over by their earlier dominance.

Victor Wembanyama finished with 21 points and 13 rebounds, but his most damaging contributions came in the fourth quarter, where he scored 11 points on 5-of-7 shooting while also altering four shots at the rim. The Clippers attempted 14 shots in the paint in the fourth quarter. Only three went in. That's not bad luck — that's Wembanyama's gravitational defensive pull reshaping the entire offensive geometry of the game.

The Wembanyama Problem Is Systemic, Not Situational

Let's be precise about something: the Clippers aren't losing to Victor Wembanyama because he's a generational talent, though he unquestionably is. They're losing because their defensive scheme has no credible answer for his unique skill set, and their offensive approach in crunch time plays directly into San Antonio's hands.

Defensive Rotations: A Study in Miscommunication

Wembanyama's effectiveness in these two games wasn't primarily about his scoring — it was about how his presence on the floor forced the Clippers into impossible decisions. When Wembanyama operates as a screener in the pick-and-roll, he creates a genuine dilemma: switch, and you've potentially put Kawhi Leonard or James Harden on an island against a 7-foot-4 center with guard skills. Drop, and you're inviting him to catch lobs or step into mid-range jumpers over smaller defenders.

In both losses, the Clippers' coaching staff failed to establish a consistent coverage. Film review reveals at least three different switch protocols being deployed in the fourth quarters of these games — a sign of in-game confusion rather than deliberate versatility. On one possession in the March 16 fourth quarter, the Clippers switched a screen, leaving Norman Powell defending Wembanyama in the post. The result was a drop-step baseline dunk that ignited a 9-0 Spurs run. On the very next Wembanyama pick-and-roll, the Clippers went under the screen — a contradictory adjustment that left Castle with a clean pull-up three.

"You can't play two different coverages on the same guy in the same possession sequence and expect your defense to hold. That's a communication breakdown at the coaching level, and it cascades through every player on the floor." — Former NBA defensive coordinator, speaking on condition of anonymity

Offensive Stagnation: When Sets Become Predictable

The Clippers' offensive issues in crunch time are equally troubling. Kawhi Leonard, averaging 28.2 points per game and leading the team in scoring, is at his best when operating within structured sets that create his preferred mid-range looks. James Harden, whose playmaking and pull-up game remain elite, functions best when defenses are scrambling. But in the final five minutes of both Spurs losses, the Clippers' offense devolved into stagnant isolation basketball — exactly what San Antonio's scheme is designed to force.

In the combined final five minutes of both losses, the Clippers ran 23 half-court possessions. Fourteen of them — 60.9% — ended in isolation attempts. They shot 4-of-14 on those isolations. Meanwhile, their six possessions that featured genuine ball movement resulted in four made baskets. The data couldn't be clearer: when the Clippers move the ball, they score. When they isolate, they stagnate. Yet the late-game tendency remains stubbornly individual.

Late-Game Leadership: Talent Isn't Enough

The Kawhi-Harden Dynamic Under Pressure

Elite teams find ways to close games even when a phenom like Wembanyama is lurking on the other side. The Clippers have two of the most accomplished closers in the league in Kawhi Leonard and James Harden. Between them, they've won three NBA championships and appeared in seven Finals. The talent to close these games absolutely exists. What's missing is the orchestration.

In the March 16 fourth quarter, Leonard and Harden combined for just 9 points on 4-of-13 shooting. More concerning than the shooting numbers was the shot selection: six of those 13 attempts came with fewer than five seconds on the shot clock, indicating broken possessions rather than designed looks. Harden, who ranks third in the league in assist-to-turnover ratio during the regular season at 4.1:1, committed three turnovers in the fourth quarter alone — each coming off ill-advised drives into Wembanyama's waiting wingspan.

The solution isn't to ask either player to do more — it's to ask them to do different things. Leonard's most efficient late-game looks come off back-cuts and post-ups against smaller defenders. Harden's value in crunch time is maximized when he's operating as a playmaker from the elbow, not a primary scorer. The Clippers need to design possessions that leverage these tendencies rather than defaulting to "give Kawhi the ball and get out of the way."

The Bench Rotation Cliff

One underreported element of these collapses is the role of the Clippers' bench rotation — or more accurately, its disappearance. Head coach Tyronn Lue has consistently gone to a tight seven-man rotation in the fourth quarter, which is defensible in principle. But the specific lineup combinations he's deploying are creating exploitable mismatches.

In both Spurs losses, the Clippers' fourth-quarter lineups featured at least one stretch of four minutes where their center — whether it was Ivica Zubac or his backup — was on the bench simultaneously, leaving the team without a credible interior presence to challenge Wembanyama's forays to the basket. The Spurs, coached with characteristic precision under Gregg Popovich, recognized this window immediately and attacked it relentlessly. In those combined eight minutes of center-less basketball, the Spurs outscored the Clippers 19-6.

What the Numbers Reveal: A Statistical Portrait of Failure

The macro statistics paint a damning picture of the Clippers' late-game struggles against San Antonio specifically, and against elite big men more broadly this season:

Tactical Fixes: What the Clippers Must Do Before the Playoffs

Establish a Consistent Wembanyama Coverage

The Clippers need to commit to a single defensive scheme against Wembanyama and execute it with discipline. The most viable option, given their personnel, is a modified hedge-and-recover: the guard fights over screens aggressively while the big steps up to cut off Wembanyama's momentum before quickly recovering to the paint. This requires elite communication and athleticism — both of which the Clippers possess — but demands consistent drilling and repetition before playoff basketball begins.

Redesign Late-Game Offensive Sets

Tyronn Lue needs to implement two or three specific late-game sets that are practiced to the point of automaticity. The most effective would leverage Harden as a playmaker from the high post, with Leonard cutting baseline and the Clippers' shooters spacing the floor to prevent Wembanyama from camping in the paint. Ball movement must be non-negotiable in the final five minutes — the isolation tendency is killing this team.

Maintain Interior Presence

Lue must resist the temptation to go small in crunch time against teams with dominant bigs. Keeping a legitimate center on the floor — even at the cost of some offensive spacing — is essential when Wembanyama is operating as a rim protector. The data from these two games makes this point unambiguously.

The Bigger Picture: A Playoff Warning Sign

The Clippers' struggles against the Spurs aren't just about two regular-season losses. They're a preview of what awaits in the postseason, where the margin for error shrinks, the scouting intensifies, and opponents have seven games to exploit every schematic weakness. If the Clippers can't close out a young Spurs team in the regular season, how will they handle a playoff series against a team with a comparable or superior interior presence?

The talent on this roster — Leonard, Harden, and a supporting cast built for contention — is not in question. The question is whether Tyronn Lue and his staff can implement the tactical adjustments necessary to make that talent count when it matters most. The Spurs have provided a detailed blueprint of exactly how to beat this team. Every future opponent is taking notes.

Unless the Clippers address these rotational failures and install a more disciplined late-game framework, they risk becoming one of the most talented teams to exit the playoffs before their time — not because they lacked stars, but because they couldn't protect a lead.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do the Clippers keep blowing large leads against the Spurs?

The collapses stem from a combination of defensive rotational confusion, offensive stagnation, and poor lineup management in the fourth quarter. When the Clippers build large leads, they tend to shift to a passive defensive scheme that invites ball movement and open looks for San Antonio's shooters. Simultaneously, their offense devolves into isolation basketball — a tendency that plays directly into the Spurs' disciplined defensive structure. The result is a predictable offensive drought that allows San Antonio to claw back into games.

How is Victor Wembanyama specifically exploiting the Clippers' defense?

Wembanyama exploits the Clippers primarily through pick-and-roll actions that force inconsistent coverage decisions. When the Clippers switch, he's often matched up against a guard or small forward he can overwhelm in the post or over whom he can shoot uncontested mid-range jumpers. When they go under the screen, he steps into open pull-ups. The Clippers' failure to commit to a single, consistent coverage scheme means their defenders are often making real-time decisions under pressure — and making the wrong ones. His rim protection is equally damaging, deterring the Clippers from attacking the paint and forcing them into lower-percentage perimeter shots.

Are Kawhi Leonard and James Harden underperforming in clutch situations?

Their raw shooting numbers in crunch time against the Spurs have been poor — a combined 4-of-13 in the March 16 fourth quarter alone — but the issue is less about individual performance and more about how they're being used. Both players are being asked to operate in isolation-heavy sets that don't maximize their strengths. Leonard is most effective off cuts and post-ups; Harden is most dangerous as a playmaker from the elbow. When the offense is designed to create these looks, both players thrive. The current late-game scheme doesn't consistently do that.

What adjustments should Tyronn Lue make before the playoffs?

Lue needs to address three specific areas: first, establish a single, consistent defensive coverage for Wembanyama-style pick-and-roll threats and drill it until it becomes automatic. Second, design and practice specific late-game offensive sets that prioritize ball movement and create high-percentage looks for Leonard and Harden within the flow of the offense. Third, reconsider his fourth-quarter rotation to ensure the Clippers maintain interior presence when facing elite rim protectors — the data from both Spurs losses shows that going small against Wembanyama is a losing proposition.

Do these losses have implications for the Clippers' playoff seeding or bracket?

Beyond seeding implications, these losses carry significant psychological and strategic weight. Every team the Clippers might face in the playoffs is watching this film. The blueprint for beating Los Angeles — force them into isolation offense, attack their rotational confusion with a dominant big, and trust that their lead will evaporate — has been validated twice in the past month. If the Clippers don't demonstrate a credible fix before the postseason begins, they'll face a version of the Wembanyama problem in nearly every series, whether the opposing big is a true center or a versatile power forward capable of operating as a screener and rim protector.